tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14877979.post114178141651580200..comments2023-04-09T11:14:34.144-04:00Comments on HARDECKER: LegalismBill Hardeckerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15552819877860565186noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14877979.post-81830199770643873792013-07-21T15:22:32.524-04:002013-07-21T15:22:32.524-04:00I think I defined what legalism is in the article....I think I defined what legalism is in the article. It was defined in the third paragraph. BTW, your definitions of legalism are spot on although I take #1 to be the exact definition.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11879718171217215602noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14877979.post-2089945385724882732013-07-21T13:55:56.539-04:002013-07-21T13:55:56.539-04:00So you responded to a charge of legalism by statin...So you responded to a charge of legalism by stating that 'syncretized' music (rock) is not of the Lord? <br /><br />THAT was your answer to legalism? <br /><br />Do YOU know what legalism is?<br /><br />Legalism is 1) using the Law to obtain or maintain salvation 2) using codes of behavior that are not against that Law as a means of judging people 3) outwardly 'right' behavior done for wrong motives (ie - anything not done in love).<br /><br />Music or lack of music is not what saves a person or maintains their salvation. Jesus and Jesus alone is what saves a person and is Who maintains a person's salvation. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com